Tied Aid: The receiving country accepts aid with the expectation that it is spent in the lending country. Within Health, the top three spending areas in 2019 were Medical Research (339m), Family Planning (252m) and Infectious Disease Control (182m). We are always keen to enhance the value of these statistics and welcome your feedback either via our Statistics User Group or via email statistics@fcdo.gov.uk. Multilateral organisations offer economies of scale in their operations and expertise, and often have the mandate and legitimacy to work in politically sensitive situations. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) implemented a new methodology for calculating GDP in its September 2019 Blue Book (the UK National Account statistics), that in turn had an impact on Gross National Income (GNI). It also consists of ODA-eligible expenditure within donor countries, such as the ODA-eligible portion of costs to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. Figure 1 legend: The blue bars are the UK ODA spend from 1970 to 2019, the pink line is the calculated ODA:GNI ratio from 1970 to 2019 and the grey dashed line is the 0.7% ODA:GNI target set by the United Nations General Assembly in 1970. This was partly driven by frontline diplomacy, Yemen (fourth largest recipient of UK ODA in 2019) saw the largest increase in bilateral ODA spend, increasing by 56.5% from 166 million in 2018 to 260 million in 2019, surpassing the spend in 2017 (205m) (Figure 6). While Ukraine has been able to acquire a variety of modern weapons from the U.S. and Europe, few countries have been willing to d. 17 hours ago. Other reasons for fluctuations between years include the change in UKs share of the EU budget in comparison to other member states and exchange rate variations, in 2019, the UKs core contribution to IDA was 891 million, a decrease of 1,040 million from 2018. Table 4 shows multilateral UK ODA in 2015, 2018 and 2019 by government agency and delivery channel i.e. The saving . In 2020, Britain spent 14.5bn on foreign aid, a figure that meets the 0.7 per cent target, according to provisional data published by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in April. Non-DFID contributors also spent a larger proportion of their ODA in Europe and the Americas (19.9%), compared to DFID (2.8%). Aid is financed from US taxpayers and other revenue sources that Congress appropriates . The grey section represents the proportion of total UK ODA that was channelled as core contributions to multilaterals, Core Multilateral. They are published prior to the release of final ODA statistics by the OECD DAC for all OECD members. Total bilateral aid commitments to Ukraine 2022-2023, by country and type. The majority of this increase was spent in the health sector, and the largest country-specific increase was to South Sudan (see 4.1.3.2 for more information). DFID data for this publication is based on an extract of the ARIES database taken in June 2019, after the end of the calendar year 2019 and financial year 2019/20. Britain will only spend . Section 3 - sectoral data on education, health and water supply & sanitation plus general data on other sectors. Figure 8: Country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2009-2019. In 2016, the UK spent 13.4 billion on overseas aid, in line with the 0.7% target. Bilateral ODA is earmarked spend either through multilateral organisations or other delivery partners, compared with multilateral ODA which is un-earmarked funding to multilateral organisations[footnote 9]. A small proportion of non-DFID spend is estimated, for example Gift Aid on ODA eligible activity. There are 2 cross-government funds, the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) and the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund. The Government has announced that it expects to spend 10 billion on overseas development assistance (ODA) in 2021/22. II. Over 5 years: Increasing from 2015, spend to Asia reached a peak in 2016 before steadily falling by 109 million to 2,235 million in 2018. Government departments other than FCDO will provide project-level details that allow the ODA spend to be quality assured by FCDO statisticians. This was an increase of 211 million (or 1.9%) compared with 2018, ODA spend by departments other than DFID and other contributors of UK ODA was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, Africa remained the largest recipient of UK region-specific bilateral ODA in 2019 accounting for 50.6%, the top 3 recipients of UK bilateral country specific ODA were Pakistan (305m), Ethiopia (300m) and Afghanistan (292m), UK bilateral ODA to Yemen was 260 million, an increase of 94 million compared to 2018 - this was the largest increase to any country in 2019, the largest amount of bilateral ODA was focused on Humanitarian Aid (1,536m), Health (1,431m) and Multisector/ Cross-Cutting (1,325m) sectors. The strategy is published in the context of reduced UK aid spending and the Government's wider foreign policy intentions to increase UK efforts in Africa and the Indo-Pacific, partly in response to China. Figure 17: DAC Donors Provisional ODA:GNI Ratio, 2018 and 2019[footnote 26]. the social, economic or humanitarian assistance area it aims to support. Accordingly, they enable individual donor governments, such as the UK, to support development and humanitarian work in a wider range of countries. Bilateral ODA to Africa increased steadily from 2015 briefly dropping in 2018 to 2,863 million. In 2022, the United States government donated over 12 billion U.S. dollars in humanitarian aid worldwide. Income groups: DFID - non-DFID comparison 2019, Figure 9: Breakdown of country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2019. This was partly due to an increase in Developing Country Unspecified spending in 2019. To help us improve GOV.UK, wed like to know more about your visit today. The Cross-Government Prosperity Fund has increased its ODA spend year on year, since the fund started spending ODA in 2016, as they move more programmes into implementation, despite DFIDs ODA spend increasing, DFIDs share of total ODA dropped from 74.9% in 2018 to 73.1% in 2019. In the most recent three years for which data are available, UK aid spending per refugee in the UK almost tripled, increasing from 6,700 per capita in 2019 to 21,700 per capita in 2021. Non-DFID EU contributions include ODA eligible spend in peace, security, democracy, human rights and civil society. EU attribution fluctuates from year to year in part because the EU works on a 7 year programming cycle and so EU disbursements in a given year can vary. The analysis in this chapter is based on provisional[footnote 21] 2019 ODA data from all 29 Development Assistance Committee (DAC) member countries[footnote 22] except the UK, for which final 2019 ODA data is used. Difference between Provisional and Final publications. It shows the UK sent the most foreign aid to Pakistan in 2015, while UK foreign aid to India rounded off the top 10 at 150.4 million. Non-departmental ODA, for example Gift Aid claimed by charities carrying out ODA eligible activities and spend by Devolved Administrations, contributed 692 million in 2019, approximately the same compared to 2018. Luxembourg made the largest contribution as a percentage of gross national income (GNI) at 1.05% and . Figure 9: Breakdown of DFID (A) and non-DFID (B), Country/region Specific proportion of Bilateral ODA by Region, 2015 & 2019. See section 4.3.3 for information on how we estimate which countries and sectors the UK core contributions benefit, Information on the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund, In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. , GNI is monitored using forecasts published by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to manage the 0.7% commitment, See background note (p. 43) in SID 2017, See OECD, Aid Statistics, Methodology webpage. Multilateral funding, by Government Departments and other contributors[footnote 20]. For media enquiries please contact the FCDO Press Office on +44 (0)20 7008 3100. For the first time since 2014, there was no core contribution to the IMF-Poverty Reduction Growth Trust. Individual departments that bid for funding are accountable for their own spending and delivery under the given fund. This was primarily driven by an increase in humanitarian aid spending (45m increase on 2018) with material relief assistance and services being provided for Rohingya refugees, Tanzania moved out of the top 10 recipients of UK bilateral ODA, this was partly driven by a decrease in spend to programmes focused on social and economic infrastructure and services (Figure 7), total UK bilateral ODA received by LDCs and Other LICs increased by 13.1% (328m) from 2,496 million in 2018 to 2,823 million in 2019 (Figure 8). The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. If you require any other data or information, or if you have any thoughts about how to improve the publication, please contact the statistics team at: statistics@fcdo.gov.uk. Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). DCMSs Cultural Protection Fund supports developing countries, mainly in Middle Eastern conflict zones, to protect and restore their cultural heritage. Within this major sector the top three spending areas were Research/Scientific institutions (358m), Multisector Aid (307m) and Environmental Policy and Administrative Management (208m). These non-DFID sources account for around 29.6% in 2019 and are largely derived from financial transaction data. In 2019, non-DFID ODA contributors spent 699 million in Asia, accounting for 44.8% of their total spend. Least Developed Countries (LDCs/Other LICs) received more Humanitarian Aid (949m, 33.6% of total bilateral ODA to LDCs/Other LICs) and Health support (528m, 18.7% of total bilateral ODA to LDCs/Other LICs), whereas spend in these sectors was much lower for Upper-Middle Income Countries, where more ODA is spent on Multisector/Cross-Cutting sectors (140m, 20.1% of total bilateral ODA to UMICs) and Government and Civil Society (131m, 18.9% of total bilateral ODA to UMICs), View full size version of infographic: Case Study 2 Humanitarian. ODA allocation was 14.5 billion in 2020. The UKs share of total DAC ODA was 12.7 per cent. , From 2018 onwards, Official Development Assistance (ODA) has changed from being measured on a cash basis to a grant equivalent basis, following a decision taken by the DAC in 2014. Major sectors are ordered from top to bottom by largest 2019 ODA spend. By Jennifer Scott, political reporter. Figure 18 legend: Top 15 recipient countries of total ODA from the DAC donor countries in 2018 and the UKs share of ODA in these recipient countries (orange) compared to other DAC countries ODA share (blue). Ed Miliband, 9 June 2021. Figure 15 legend: Comparison of sector spend for 2019 UK bilateral ODA between countries of different income groups ( million). The UK's foreign aid spend will come down from 0.7% of national income to 0.5%. This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. For example, DFID contributed 112 million to the Global Partnership for Education, a multilateral organisation supporting close to 70 developing countries to ensure that every child receives a quality basic education, 11.8% was classed as Other, which includes Other Technical Assistance and Basket Funds. In 2015 the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act placed the 0.7% commitment in UK law from 2015 and in each subsequent calendar year. The top 3 spending sectors in this area were Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management (217m), Civilian Peace-Building, Conflict Prevention and Resolution (199m) and Media and free flow of information (119m). Figure 6 legend: Top 5 Recipients of 2019 UK Bilateral ODA ( millions), 2009 to 2019. Highlighted countries are those in receipt of UK bilateral ODA, and colours are based on amount received (dark blue=higher amounts UK Bilateral ODA received, light blue=lower amounts UK Bilateral ODA received). Figure 4: UK Bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009-2019. Figure 13: Bilateral ODA by Government Department and Major Sector, 2019. Correspondingly, 11 African countries featured in the UK's top 20 recipient countries. The top 3 recipients of Humanitarian Aid spend were Yemen (219m), Syria (194m) and Bangladesh (125m). For more information please see the explanatory note that was published in September 2019. In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. You have accepted additional cookies. Figure 17 legend: ODA spend in terms of GNI comparing 2018 and 2019 spend for each DAC donor country (ODA:GNI ratio). Figure 4 legend: UK bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009 2019. In 2019, 42.4% (4,350m) of UK bilateral ODA was made up of spend that was not assigned to a single benefitting country or region (i.e. Information on the main definitions and sources used in this publication can be found in Annexes 2 and 3 respectively of the Statistics on International Development publication. The remaining top recipients of UK ODA were Pakistan and Nigeria, Afghanistan remains the largest recipient of DAC country members ODA totalling 2.7 billion in 2018. This reflects that core contributions to multilaterals, are in general, based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, 10,258 million of UK ODA spend was delivered through bilateral channels. 3-min read. UK climate finance spending by government department, 2011/12-2016/17. For now, we're looking at 2021 spending solely by economic aid. By 2021 we could be spending about 14.5 billion, based on the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecasts and in 2016 prices. The note sets out plans to discontinue the publication of the GPEX suite of tables due to (i) low public usage and (ii) being able to meet the main known needs by adding 3 pilot summary tables to Statistics on International Development (SID).